![]() But if one is going to give credence to these times then the context in which they arise has to be evaluated and given some credence too. Hellmann does not give us the full context and details of Guede’s remark. ![]() This is where Hellmann gets his time frame for Time of Death. I think nine‐twenty, nine‐thirty, around then, and then, when I heard the scream…………” Around nine, nine twenty or so, because in the meantime we had gotten to talking and all. But if I understand, I mean like where was this…I mean, what time do you think this happened, I don’t know… So, I really had to take this shit, but then I heard a scream, but let me tell you, a really loud scream, so loud that according to me, if anyone was passing by, nearby, they would have heard this scream, because she screamed so loud…and then, then, I got a bit worried and I got out of the bathroom right away, without even putting my pants back on, they were practically falling down, I was wearing just my underwear and my pants were falling around my… I was in the bathroom, in the bathroom maybe five minutes. It is true that in the Skype chat Guede goes on to say the following. Given what is certainly a falsehood why give credence to any of Guede’s times? But Hellmann does. Guede has himself and Meredith meeting up at the cottage by prior appointment at a time when Meredith could not possibly have been there, because she was still at the house of her english friends and she and Sophie Purton did not part ways until they were near the cottage at 9 pm. But in fact no, we were supposed to see each other, we had made an appointment the evening before during the Halloween party, at the Spanish kids’ house, and I can also say, well I don’t know the street but I can say where it was.”Īlthough this does not exclude Hellmann’s time frame of 9.00 to 9.30 there is a manifest problem with Guede’s account. Guede - “So we went in, and I think it was about eight‐thirty, or eight‐twenty, they’re saying that she told her friends she was tired and wanted to go home. Invece no, ci dovevamo vedere, ci eravamo dati puntamento la sera prima nella festa di Halloween, che abbiamo passato a casa di questi ragazzi spagnoli e posso dire anche dove, non so la via ma posso indicare dove.” Guede - “allora siamo entrati, e penso che saranno state le otto e mezza così, le otto e venti, è stato, è stato detto che lei aveva detto alle sue amiche che era stanca che sarebbe andata a casa. So, if an appeal judge can hold Guede to be reliable in this respect do the little angels have an alibi? However just check the record of that skype chat. However, what’s the evidence for these propositions - and is it reliable?Īlthough TOD could have been between these times there is no evidence that it was other than, as we shall see in a moment, Guede’s own words. This is important because it appears towards the beginning of the report and, reading on through it, we can see that virtually the whole report, and the ludicrous waiving away of all the other evidence, is predicated on it. Guede was in the cottage with Meredith between these timesĮrgo, it was Guede, or perhaps, at a push, Guede and others but not including Knox and Sollecito, who murdered Meredith. ![]() Time Of Death (TOD) between 9.00 and 9.30 pmĢ. There are three basic elements to this argument.ġ. “In that chat, furthermore, Rudy Guede states that he was in Via della Pergola between 9 and 9.30 pm and this fact which significantly brings forward the time of death of Meredith Kercher, in respect of that held in the sentence under appeal, does not reconcile with the prosecution hypothesis in regard to the present accused who, even with the desire to recognize as credible some elements held by the prosecution in support of it’s own hypothesis, at the time were certainly at the house of Raffaele Sollecito and not at Via della Pergola.” In the quote below he pins Guede with sole responsibility and provides Knox and Sollecito with an alibi. Here’s an interesting vignette on Hellmann’s modus operandi in his Motivation. Wednesday, Aug2011 Hellman Appeal Verdict Annulled Misrepresentations Fog Reality Still Posted by James Raper If appeal fails, Depp gets $8.35m instantly. ![]() Only known appeal grounds is judicial error, no neutral lawyer points to any. AH must post $8.35m bond plus interest to appeal, her lawyer balked but judge firmly insisted. Judgement entered: $10.35m to Depp less $2m to Heard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |